On Saturday, December 3, 2016 4:36:37 AM CET Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 13:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
> > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> > being treated as zero i
On Fri, 2016-12-02 at 13:40 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
> final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc
> symbol gets dropped, and any modu
On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 01:40:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
> final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc
> symbol gets dropped, and a
On Friday, December 2, 2016 1:59:15 PM CET Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
>
> 2.26?
>
> > final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> > being tr
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
2.26?
> final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
> being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc
2.27?
> symbol gets dropped
With binutils-2.16 and before, a weak missing symbol was kept during the
final link, and a missing CRC for an export would lead to that CRC
being treated as zero implicitly. With binutils-2.17, the crc
symbol gets dropped, and any module trying to use it will fail to
load.
This sets the weak CRC s
6 matches
Mail list logo
