Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread David Newall
linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: But there are some things that get set up long before udelay() is calibrated! The interrupt controllers, the timer, etc. You can't just substitute or you will end up with machines that won't boot! The initial value could be set conservatively high. -- To unsubs

Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread Rene Herman
On 12-12-07 21:18, linux-os (Dick Johnson) wrote: But there are some things that get set up long before udelay() is calibrated! The interrupt controllers, the timer, etc. You can't just substitute or you will end up with machines that won't boot! We understand the problem. But it's not all tha

Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread linux-os (Dick Johnson)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Rene Herman wrote: > Hi everyone. > > That was a succesful request, thanks to all who responded. This message also > just now went out with all the respondents in CC but I believe that copy > isn't making the list, so here's one without... > > In total you provided 60 reports

Re: [RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread Vegard Nossum
On Dec 12, 2007 8:14 PM, Rene Herman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Time varies between 0.54 microseconds and 2.50 microseconds, with most > around 1.3/1.4 microseconds. Numbers 58, 59 and 60 (the ones at > 2 us) I > dont completely trust since similar machines are among the fastest as well. Hi. Ju

[RESULTS] Port 0x80 I/O speed

2007-12-12 Thread Rene Herman
Hi everyone. That was a succesful request, thanks to all who responded. This message also just now went out with all the respondents in CC but I believe that copy isn't making the list, so here's one without... In total you provided 60 reports which are listed below in increasing order of tim