Re: FUSE workflow=? (Re: [RESEND1, PATCH 1/2] fuse: convert printk -> pr_*)

2019-04-24 Thread Kirill Smelkov
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:57:35AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > +torvalds > > > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:57:58PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > > > > > Functions

Re: FUSE workflow=? (Re: [RESEND1, PATCH 1/2] fuse: convert printk -> pr_*)

2019-04-24 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 10:38 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > +torvalds > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:57:58PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > > > Functions, like pr_err, are a more modern variant of printing compared to > > > printk. T

FUSE workflow=? (Re: [RESEND1, PATCH 1/2] fuse: convert printk -> pr_*)

2019-04-24 Thread Kirill Smelkov
+torvalds On Tue, Apr 23, 2019 at 04:57:58PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > > > Functions, like pr_err, are a more modern variant of printing compared to > > printk. They could be used to denoise sources by using needed level in > > the p

Re: [RESEND1, PATCH 1/2] fuse: convert printk -> pr_*

2019-04-23 Thread Miklos Szeredi
On Wed, Mar 27, 2019 at 10:15 AM Kirill Smelkov wrote: > > Functions, like pr_err, are a more modern variant of printing compared to > printk. They could be used to denoise sources by using needed level in > the print function name, and by automatically inserting per-driver / > function / ... prin

[RESEND1, PATCH 1/2] fuse: convert printk -> pr_*

2019-03-27 Thread Kirill Smelkov
Functions, like pr_err, are a more modern variant of printing compared to printk. They could be used to denoise sources by using needed level in the print function name, and by automatically inserting per-driver / function / ... print prefix as defined by pr_fmt macro. pr_* are also said to be used