RE: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-27 Thread Tirdea, Irina
Darren Hart wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:43:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Darren Hart wrote: > > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:38:54PM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote: > > > > intel_pmc_* drivers or is it enough to move it as a standalone > > > > driver for now? > > >

Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-26 Thread Darren Hart
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:43:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Darren Hart wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:38:54PM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote: > > > intel_pmc_* drivers or is it enough to move it as a standalone driver for > > > now? > > > > If the functionality is

Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-26 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016, Darren Hart wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:38:54PM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote: > > intel_pmc_* drivers or is it enough to move it as a standalone driver for > > now? > > If the functionality is substantially different, then I don't see a > compelling, and certainly not a

Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-26 Thread Darren Hart
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 01:38:54PM +, Tirdea, Irina wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:52:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Irina Tirdea wrote: > > > > The patch has already been reviewed by Stephen Boyd [1]. > > > > The only remaining question is the one pointed

RE: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-24 Thread Tirdea, Irina
e...@alsa-project.org; Mark Brown; Takashi Iwai; Bossart, Pierre-louis; > LKML; Pierre-Louis Bossart > Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:52:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Irina Tirdea

Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-20 Thread Darren Hart
On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 11:52:38PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Irina Tirdea wrote: > > The patch has already been reviewed by Stephen Boyd [1]. > > The only remaining question is the one pointed out by Stephen: > > "Will there be problems if this merges through clk tree? If

Re: [RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-20 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016, Irina Tirdea wrote: > The patch has already been reviewed by Stephen Boyd [1]. > The only remaining question is the one pointed out by Stephen: > "Will there be problems if this merges through clk tree? If so we > could take the clk driver part and the platform data include par

[RESEND PATCH v4] clk: x86: Add Atom PMC platform clocks

2016-10-17 Thread Irina Tirdea
The BayTrail and CherryTrail platforms provide platform clocks through their Power Management Controller (PMC). The SoC supports up to 6 clocks (PMC_PLT_CLK[5:0]) with a frequency of either 19.2 MHz (PLL) or 25 MHz (XTAL) for BayTrail an a frequency of 19.2 MHz (XTAL) for CherryTrail. These clocks