Am Montag, 10. September 2007 schrieb Laurent Vivier:
> The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
I would move this line
if (p->flags & PF_VCPU) {
account_guest_time(p, cputime);
--> p->flags &= ~PF_VCPU; <-
Laurent Vivier wrote:
And as values are read with a sscanf() by procps, I think adding a field at the
end of the line is not a problem.
It's not. At the time iowait was introduced I verified this
in procps.
--
All Rights Reversed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe l
Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This new version remove conditional compilation on GUEST_ACCOUNTING.
excellent! For all 4 patches:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i'd suggest inclusion into 2.6.24.
can the /proc change break anything? Any old procp
Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> This new version remove conditional compilation on GUEST_ACCOUNTING.
>
> excellent! For all 4 patches:
>
> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> i'd suggest inclusion into 2.6.24.
Thank you.
> can the /proc change
* Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This new version remove conditional compilation on GUEST_ACCOUNTING.
excellent! For all 4 patches:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
i'd suggest inclusion into 2.6.24.
can the /proc change break anything? Any old procps version perhaps?
Laurent Vivier wrote:
The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Vivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
Politics is the struggle between those who want to make their country
the best in the world,
This new version remove conditional compilation on GUEST_ACCOUNTING.
--
The aim of these four patches is to introduce Virtual Machine time accounting.
[PATCH 1/4] as recent CPUs introduce a third running state, after "user" and
"system", we need a new field, "guest", in cpustat to store
7 matches
Mail list logo
