On 18/06/2019 21:18, Anna Schumaker wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:35 +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> Trond, Anna,
>>
>> On 12/06/2019 15:23, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>> On 05/06/2019 23:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
I'd be OK with just reverting this patch if it is causing a
p
On Tue, 2019-06-18 at 10:35 +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Trond, Anna,
>
> On 12/06/2019 15:23, Jon Hunter wrote:
> > On 05/06/2019 23:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > > I'd be OK with just reverting this patch if it is causing a
> > > performance
> > > issue.
> > >
> > > Anna?
> >
Trond, Anna,
On 12/06/2019 15:23, Jon Hunter wrote:
>
> On 05/06/2019 23:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
>
> ...
>
>> I'd be OK with just reverting this patch if it is causing a performance
>> issue.
>>
>> Anna?
>
> Any update on this?
I have not seen any update on this. Do you plan to revert this
On 05/06/2019 23:01, Trond Myklebust wrote:
...
> I'd be OK with just reverting this patch if it is causing a performance
> issue.
>
> Anna?
Any update on this?
Thanks
Jon
--
nvpublic
On Wed, 2019-06-05 at 09:40 +0100, Jon Hunter wrote:
> Hi Trond,
>
> I have been noticing intermittent failures with a system suspend test
> on
> some of our machines that have a NFS mounted root file-system.
> Bisecting
> this issue points to your commit 431235818bc3 ("SUNRPC: Declare RPC
> timer
Hi Trond,
I have been noticing intermittent failures with a system suspend test on
some of our machines that have a NFS mounted root file-system. Bisecting
this issue points to your commit 431235818bc3 ("SUNRPC: Declare RPC
timers as TIMER_DEFERRABLE") and reverting this on top of v5.2-rc3 does
ap
6 matches
Mail list logo