Hi Rafael,
2012/11/16 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:07:49 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
Hi Rafael,
2012/11/16 9:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send ejec
On Friday, November 16, 2012 10:07:49 AM Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> 2012/11/16 9:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
> >> The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> >> 1. send eject request by SCI
> >> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bu
Hi Rafael,
2012/11/16 9:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be ca
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 05:40:59 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > Well, I have tried _really_ hard to apply this patchset, but pretty much
> > > none of the patches except for [1/7] applied for me. I have no idea what
> > > tree they are against, but I'm pretty sure it's not my tree.
> > >
> > >
> > Well, I have tried _really_ hard to apply this patchset, but pretty much
> > none of the patches except for [1/7] applied for me. I have no idea what
> > tree they are against, but I'm pretty sure it's not my tree.
> >
> > I _have_ applied patches [1-4/7] and pushed them to linux-pm.git/linux
On Friday, November 16, 2012 01:28:43 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
> > The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> > 1. send eject request by SCI
> > 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
> >
> > In the 1st case, acpi_mem
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:59:30 PM Wen Congyang wrote:
> The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
> 1. send eject request by SCI
> 2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
>
> In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
> In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_rem
On Friday, November 16, 2012 12:22:58 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:51:52 PM David Rientjes wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
> >
> > > Note:
> > > 1. The following commit in pm tree can be dropped now(The other two
> > > patches
> > >are al
On Thursday, November 15, 2012 02:51:52 PM David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
>
> > Note:
> > 1. The following commit in pm tree can be dropped now(The other two patches
> >are already dropped):
> >54c4c7db6cb94d7d1217df6d7fca6847c61744ab
> > 2. This patchset
On Thu, 15 Nov 2012, Wen Congyang wrote:
> Note:
> 1. The following commit in pm tree can be dropped now(The other two patches
>are already dropped):
>54c4c7db6cb94d7d1217df6d7fca6847c61744ab
> 2. This patchset requires the following patch(It is in pm tree now)
>https://lkml.org/lkml/2
The memory device can be removed by 2 ways:
1. send eject request by SCI
2. echo 1 >/sys/bus/pci/devices/PNP0C80:XX/eject
In the 1st case, acpi_memory_disable_device() will be called.
In the 2nd case, acpi_memory_device_remove() will be called.
acpi_memory_device_remove() will also be called when
11 matches
Mail list logo
