> Subject: Re: [Patch v4] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request through
> kmalloc
>
> On 4/20/2018 2:41 PM, Long Li wrote:
> >> Subject: Re: [Patch v4] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request
> >> through kmalloc
> >>
> >> Looks good
On 4/20/2018 2:41 PM, Long Li wrote:
Subject: Re: [Patch v4] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request through
kmalloc
Looks good, but I have two possibly style-related comments.
On 4/19/2018 5:38 PM, Long Li wrote:
From: Long Li
The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be D
> Subject: Re: [Patch v4] cifs: Allocate validate negotiation request through
> kmalloc
>
> Looks good, but I have two possibly style-related comments.
>
> On 4/19/2018 5:38 PM, Long Li wrote:
> > From: Long Li
> >
> > The data buffer allocated on the stack
2018-04-20 7:55 GMT-07:00 Tom Talpey :
> Looks good, but I have two possibly style-related comments.
>
>
> On 4/19/2018 5:38 PM, Long Li wrote:
>>
>> From: Long Li
>>
>> The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be DMA'ed, ib_dma_map_page
>> will
>> return an invalid DMA address for a buffer on
Looks good, but I have two possibly style-related comments.
On 4/19/2018 5:38 PM, Long Li wrote:
From: Long Li
The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be DMA'ed, ib_dma_map_page will
return an invalid DMA address for a buffer on stack. Even worse, this
incorrect address can't be detected
From: Long Li
The data buffer allocated on the stack can't be DMA'ed, ib_dma_map_page will
return an invalid DMA address for a buffer on stack. Even worse, this
incorrect address can't be detected by ib_dma_mapping_error. Sending data
from this address to hardware will not fail, but the remote pe
6 matches
Mail list logo
