Hi Josh,
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 10:13:57 -0700 Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > > there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or
> > > does no
Hi Josh,
On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 09:41:55 -0700 Josh Triplett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or does
> > not
> > balance) RT tasks. This was evidenced using the sched_foo
On Thu, 2007-07-12 at 09:41 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or does
> > not
> > balance) RT tasks. This was evidenced using the sched_football testcase
> > available from
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or does not
> balance) RT tasks. This was evidenced using the sched_football testcase
> available from the RT wiki
> (http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/IBM_Test_Cases)
>
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 13:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > >
> > > P.S. Thanks to Steven Rostedt for logdev which is proving invaluable in
> > >cases like this.
> > >
>
> Great to hear!!!
>
> I'l
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 19:06:20 +0200 Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> > The following patch fixes this by re-enabling the RT overload detection
> > for the CFS. It may not be the right solution, maybe it should be
> > incorpo
> On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> >
> > P.S. Thanks to Steven Rostedt for logdev which is proving invaluable in
> >cases like this.
> >
Great to hear!!!
I'll be uploading a new version of Logdev in a week or so.
Thanks for the feedback.
-- Steve
-
To unsub
On Wed, 2007-07-11 at 16:47 +0200, Sébastien Dugué wrote:
> The following patch fixes this by re-enabling the RT overload detection
> for the CFS. It may not be the right solution, maybe it should be incorporated
> into the other load balancing mechanisms. I did not digg deep enough yet
> to make
Hi Ingo, all
there seems to be something wrong with the way the CFS balances (or does not
balance) RT tasks. This was evidenced using the sched_football testcase
available from the RT wiki (http://rt.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/IBM_Test_Cases)
which I modified and attached to this mail.
The
9 matches
Mail list logo
