Re: [Patch] memparse should return long long

2001-01-15 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi Randy, On Mon, 15 Jan 2001, Randy Dunlap wrote: > Why not (?): Because I did not need it (always used #G or #M) and did not know the function. But it's apparently correct to use simple_strtoull. >> diff -uNr 2.4.0-ac/lib/cmdline.c 2.4.0-ac-memparse/lib/cmdline.c >> --- 2.4.0-ac/lib/cmdline.c

RE: [Patch] memparse should return long long

2001-01-15 Thread Dunlap, Randy
Why not (?): > diff -uNr 2.4.0-ac/lib/cmdline.c 2.4.0-ac-memparse/lib/cmdline.c > --- 2.4.0-ac/lib/cmdline.cMon Aug 28 11:42:45 2000 > +++ 2.4.0-ac-memparse/lib/cmdline.c Mon Jan 15 09:06:14 2001 > @@ -93,9 +93,9 @@ > * megabyte, or one gigabyte, respectively. > */ > > -unsigned lon

[Patch] memparse should return long long

2001-01-15 Thread Christoph Rohland
Hi, The following patch lets memparse return a long long. This is needed to use mem= on highmem machines. Greetings Christoph diff -uNr 2.4.0-ac/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c 2.4.0-ac-memparse/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c --- 2.4.0-ac/arch/i386/kernel/setup.c Tue Jan 2 21:57:54 2001 +