Re: [Patch] BUG in fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c

2006-12-19 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 19:51 +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > hi, > > while playing around with fsfuzzer, i got the following oops with jfs: > > [ 851.804875] BUG at fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:760 assert(!BT_STACK_FULL(btstack)) > [ 851.805179] [ cut here ] > [ 851.805238] kernel

Re: [Patch] BUG in fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c

2006-12-18 Thread Dave Kleikamp
On Mon, 2006-12-18 at 19:51 +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > hi, > > while playing around with fsfuzzer, i got the following oops with jfs: > > [ 851.804875] BUG at fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:760 assert(!BT_STACK_FULL(btstack)) ... > On a damaged filesystem we might have a full stack and should > not

[Patch] BUG in fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c

2006-12-18 Thread Eric Sesterhenn
hi, while playing around with fsfuzzer, i got the following oops with jfs: [ 851.804875] BUG at fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:760 assert(!BT_STACK_FULL(btstack)) [ 851.805179] [ cut here ] [ 851.805238] kernel BUG at fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:760! [ 851.805287] invalid opcode: [#1]