Hi Michael,
On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 12:09:54PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> I think your hints all make sense. I was poking around with the
> functions we have and need to asign. Unfortunetly I ran into no clear
> picture to fix it the correct way and came up with this hacky patch.
Your patc
Hi Brian,
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:19:47PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > The current approach of the read_page function is to iterate over all
> > subpages and call the correct_data function. The correct_data
Hi Michael,
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> The current approach of the read_page function is to iterate over all
> subpages and call the correct_data function. The correct_data function
> currently does the same. It iterates over all subpages and checks for
>
@David: Ping!
Some comments on this patch would probably help to get it mainline. :)
Regards,
Michael
On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 04:45:21PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> Ping!
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> > The current approach of the read_page funct
Ping!
On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:38:44PM +0200, Michael Grzeschik wrote:
> The current approach of the read_page function is to iterate over all
> subpages and call the correct_data function. The correct_data function
> currently does the same. It iterates over all subpages and checks for
> correc
The current approach of the read_page function is to iterate over all
subpages and call the correct_data function. The correct_data function
currently does the same. It iterates over all subpages and checks for
correctable and uncorrectable data. This redundant call for each
subpage leads to miscal
6 matches
Mail list logo