On Mon, 03 Jun 2013 13:00:37 -0700, Stephen Boyd
wrote:
> On 06/03/13 01:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 31/05/13 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
> re
On 06/03/13 01:54, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 31/05/13 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
>>> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
Marc Zyngier wrote:
>
> On 31/05/13 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
> >> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
> >>> ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
> >>> shall I ro
On 31/05/13 23:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
>>> ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
>>> shall I route them through arm-soc or somethi
On 06/01/2013 12:16 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
>>> ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
>>> shall I route them through arm-soc or so
On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
> >ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
> >shall I route them through arm-soc or something else?
>
>
> So there looks to be a fair
On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
shall I route them through arm-soc or something else?
So there looks to be a fair amount of additions in the ARM tree, do
th
Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
shall I route them through arm-soc or something else?
On 05/13, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> In light of Mark Rutland's recent work on divorcing the ARM architected
> timers from t
In light of Mark Rutland's recent work on divorcing the ARM architected
timers from the ARM local timer API and introducing a generic arch hook for
broadcast it seems that we should remove the local timer API entirely.
Doing so will reduce the architecture dependencies of our timer drivers,
reduce
9 matches
Mail list logo