Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on_suspend

2013-04-25 Thread Kevin Hilman
Hi Sourav, Sourav Poddar writes: > Hi Kevin, > On Thursday 25 April 2013 03:45 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: >> Sourav Poddar writes: >> >>> Remove "no_idle_on_suspend" check, since respective >>> driver should be able to prevent idling of a >>> device whenever required. >>> >>> Driver's can get same

Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on_suspend

2013-04-24 Thread Sourav Poddar
Hi Kevin, On Thursday 25 April 2013 03:45 AM, Kevin Hilman wrote: Sourav Poddar writes: Remove "no_idle_on_suspend" check, since respective driver should be able to prevent idling of a device whenever required. Driver's can get same behavior by just returning -EBUSY from their ->runtime_suspe

Re: [PATCHv3 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on_suspend

2013-04-24 Thread Kevin Hilman
Sourav Poddar writes: > Remove "no_idle_on_suspend" check, since respective > driver should be able to prevent idling of a > device whenever required. > > Driver's can get same behavior by just returning -EBUSY > from their ->runtime_suspend only during suspend. > > Cc: Santosh Shilimkar > Cc: F

[PATCHv3 5/5] arm: omap2+: omap_device: remove no_idle_on_suspend

2013-04-24 Thread Sourav Poddar
Remove "no_idle_on_suspend" check, since respective driver should be able to prevent idling of a device whenever required. Driver's can get same behavior by just returning -EBUSY from their ->runtime_suspend only during suspend. Cc: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: Felipe Balbi Cc: Rajendra nayak Cc: Gry