On Thu, Sep 6, 2018 at 6:29 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 07:37:56PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> >
> > I think the code is correct now for the issue related to uninitialized
> > pointer.
> > But there is still one problem I found stressing the code with
> > max_
On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 07:37:56PM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
SNIP
>
> I think the code is correct now for the issue related to uninitialized
> pointer.
> But there is still one problem I found stressing the code with max_alloc_size.
> The way the following is written:
>
>if (!list
Jiri,
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 7:47 AM Jiri Olsa wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:24:56AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> >
> > SNIP
> >
> > > > - /* First entry is abused to maintain the to_free list.
> > > > */
>
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 07:05:43PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:24:56AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
>
> SNIP
>
> > > - /* First entry is abused to maintain the to_free list. */
> > > - oe->buffer_idx = 2;
> > > - new = oe->buffe
On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 08:24:56AM -0700, Stephane Eranian wrote:
SNIP
> > - /* First entry is abused to maintain the to_free list. */
> > - oe->buffer_idx = 2;
> > - new = oe->buffer + 1;
> > + oe->buffer_idx = 1;
> > + new =
5 matches
Mail list logo