On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 13:44, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
>
> On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 12:00, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> > > >
On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 12:00, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
> > On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > > Apologies for my del
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 12:00, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
>
> On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > > Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
On 06/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
> > > along with holidays.
> >
> > no pb! was just making sure this wasnt falling
On Thu, 6 Aug 2020 at 02:08, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
>
> On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
> > along with holidays.
>
> no pb! was just making sure this wasnt falling through some cracks.
>
> >
> > On Fri, 24 Jul
On 05/08/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
> along with holidays.
no pb! was just making sure this wasnt falling through some cracks.
>
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 19:53, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
> wrote:
> >
> > On 24/07/20, Sumit
On 23/07/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> while loop exits.
>
> This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
> time if only partial data
Apologies for my delayed response as I was busy with some other tasks
along with holidays.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2020 at 19:53, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries
wrote:
>
> On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The current code waits f
On 24/07/20, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz, Foundries wrote:
> On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> > > second read. However the second read would not be executed as
On 24/07/20, Sumit Garg wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
> >
> > The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> > second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> > while loop exits.
> >
> > This fix does not wait if all da
On Thu, 23 Jul 2020 at 14:16, Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz wrote:
>
> The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
> second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
> while loop exits.
>
> This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
> time if
The current code waits for data to be available before attempting a
second read. However the second read would not be executed as the
while loop exits.
This fix does not wait if all data has been read and reads a second
time if only partial data was retrieved on the first read.
This fix also does
12 matches
Mail list logo
