On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 6:56 AM, Andrew Morton
wrote:
> On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:18:51 +0800 Richard Lee
> wrote:
>
>> For the IO mapping, the same physical address space maybe
>> mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
>> - 0x20001000 ~ 0x20001400 --> 1KB for Dev1
>> - 0x2000140
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:06 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Adding Nico...
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Richard Lee wrote:
>> For the IO mapping, the same physical address space maybe
>> mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
>> - 0x20001000 ~ 0x20001400 --> 1KB for Dev1
>>
On Wed, 14 May 2014 16:18:51 +0800 Richard Lee wrote:
> For the IO mapping, the same physical address space maybe
> mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
> - 0x20001000 ~ 0x20001400 --> 1KB for Dev1
> - 0x20001400 ~ 0x20001800 --> 1KB for Dev2
> and the page size is 4KB.
>
Adding Nico...
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Richard Lee wrote:
> For the IO mapping, the same physical address space maybe
> mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
> - 0x20001000 ~ 0x20001400 --> 1KB for Dev1
> - 0x20001400 ~ 0x20001800 --> 1KB for Dev2
> and the page siz
For the IO mapping, the same physical address space maybe
mapped more than one time, for example, in some SoCs:
- 0x20001000 ~ 0x20001400 --> 1KB for Dev1
- 0x20001400 ~ 0x20001800 --> 1KB for Dev2
and the page size is 4KB.
Then both Dev1 and Dev2 will do ioremap operations, and the IO
vmall
5 matches
Mail list logo