Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-17 Thread John Stultz
On 06/17/2013 11:02 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: to send >it by Thomas for 3.11 this week. Good, thanks. This means that the xtensa ccount sched_clock patch (http://lists.linux-xtensa.org/pipermail/linux-xtensa/Week-of-Mon-20130617/001077.html) that depends on the third patch in this series, can go i

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-17 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi John, On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 09:23:00AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/16/2013 02:45 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > >>On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > >>>On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: > >>>

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-17 Thread John Stultz
On 06/16/2013 02:45 AM, Baruch Siach wrote: Hi John, On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: This is mostly a resend of a p

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-16 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi John, On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 10:53:04AM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote: > >On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: > >>On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>>This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a m

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-04 Thread John Stultz
On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote: On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three and

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-04 Thread Will Deacon
On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote: > On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month > > ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three > > and get a generic sched_clock layer

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-03 Thread John Stultz
On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote: This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit patches. The last three patches add 64

Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-03 Thread Baruch Siach
Hi Stephen, On Sat, Jun 01, 2013 at 11:39:37PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month > ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three > and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit > pa

[PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly

2013-06-01 Thread Stephen Boyd
This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit patches. The last three patches add 64 bit support and move the architected timers on