On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 10:41:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 12:51:24 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >
> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> > add whatever you require yourse
On Tuesday 06 October 2015 12:51:24 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> enough for a couple of function calls".
>> This looks correct now. A few more points though:
>>
>> * My first thought would have been to do this by first defining the
>> two symbols before the #include, and then adding an #ifdef in
>> the generic file. Both approaches work though, any other opinions
>> on this?
>That's what I
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 01:52:24PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dave Martin writes:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> >> Arnd Bergmann writes:
> >>
> >> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> >> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimu
Dave Martin writes:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>>
>> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
>> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
>> > add whatever you require yourself" an
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:59:45PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Arnd Bergmann writes:
>
> > I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> > of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> > add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> >
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 12:51:24PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:31:34 Dave Martin wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > > * Can you explain in the changelog how the numbers were decided?
> > > I don't see any other architec
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> I think it makes sense to stick with the traditional definition
> of MINSIGSTKSZ == "the minimum amount that you will always need,
> add whatever you require yourself" and SIGSTKSZ == "Should be
> enough for a couple of function calls".
The python3 testsuite wants to put
On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:31:34 Dave Martin wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > * Can you explain in the changelog how the numbers were decided?
> > I don't see any other architecture using 5kb and cannot see why
> > it has to be this value rather th
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:05:43 Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
> > This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 11:05:43AM +0530, Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> This patch fixes this issue.
>
> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MIN
On Tue, Oct 06, 2015 at 09:49:29AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:05:43 Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> > MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> > This patch fixes this issue.
> >
> > This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c
On Tuesday 06 October 2015 11:05:43 Manjeet Pawar wrote:
> MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
> This patch fixes this issue.
>
> This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
> Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTK
MINSIGSTKSZ and SIGSTKSZ for ARM64 are not correctly set in latest kernel.
This patch fixes this issue.
This issue is reported in LTP (testcase: sigaltstack02.c).
Testcase failed when sigaltstack() called with stack size "MINSIGSTKSZ - 1"
Since in Glibc-2.22, MINSIGSTKSZ is set to 5120 but in kern
14 matches
Mail list logo
