On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:01:27PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:00:17PM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:35:08AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:06:43AM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:29:31A
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:00:17PM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:35:08AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:06:43AM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:29:31AM +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > > Hi Rodrigo,
> > > >
> > > > O
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 09:35:08AM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:06:43AM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:29:31AM +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > > Hi Rodrigo,
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rodrigo Campos
> > > wrote:
> > > > Is the
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 04:06:43AM +0100, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:29:31AM +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> > Hi Rodrigo,
> >
> > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > > Is there something I can help to have this merged ? As far as I tested,
> > > this
On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 02:29:31AM +, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> > Is there something I can help to have this merged ? As far as I tested, this
> > works fine here. Or is this ok, just waiting on the "perf report: Add -F
> >
Hi Rodrigo,
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Rodrigo Campos wrote:
> Is there something I can help to have this merged ? As far as I tested, this
> works fine here. Or is this ok, just waiting on the "perf report: Add -F
> option for
> specifying output fields" patchset ?
Thanks for testing!!
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 02:36:25PM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report.
> This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely
> rewrote it from scratch.
>
> This version depends on my previous percentage patch
On 4/1/14, 12:58 PM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
gdb attributes 0x10370 to a different/known symbol.
(gdb) x /i 0x10370
0x10370 : cmp$0x4c,%dl
Is this known? Could this possibly be caused by stale histogram entries from
unmapped/remapped shared libs?
Possibly.
Anyway the addr which pe
Hi Arun,
On Mon, Mar 31, 2014 at 2:26 PM, Arun Sharma wrote:
> On 3/20/14, 11:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report.
>> This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely
>> rewrote it from scratch.
>
>
>
On 3/20/14, 11:06 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
Hello,
This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report.
This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely
rewrote it from scratch.
While testing this patch series, we found error messages which look like
this:
O
Hello,
This is a new attempt to implement cumulative hist period report.
This work begins from Arun's SORT_INCLUSIVE patch [1] but I completely
rewrote it from scratch.
This version depends on my previous percentage patchset [2] and output
field patchset[3]. So please test this again although th
11 matches
Mail list logo
