* Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:30:01 -0700
> Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>
> > Hi Ingo,
> >
> > I think it's good to go.
> > Patch 1 is already in net-next. Patch 3 depends on it.
> > I'm assuming it's not going to be a problem during merge window.
> > Patch 3 will have a mino
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 16:30:01 -0700
Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Hi Ingo,
>
> I think it's good to go.
> Patch 1 is already in net-next. Patch 3 depends on it.
> I'm assuming it's not going to be a problem during merge window.
> Patch 3 will have a minor conflict in uapi/linux/bpf.h in linux-next,
Hi Ingo,
I think it's good to go.
Patch 1 is already in net-next. Patch 3 depends on it.
I'm assuming it's not going to be a problem during merge window.
Patch 3 will have a minor conflict in uapi/linux/bpf.h in linux-next,
since net-next has added new lines to the bpf_prog_type and bpf_func_id en
3 matches
Mail list logo