On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 03:35:49PM +0100, Peter Huewe wrote:
> Hi Jarkko,
>
>
> >is it cool if I prepare a separate set of fixes for all issues
> >in v9? I do not see any problem that could not be fixed without
> >major structural changes.
>
>
>
> to be honest - I would prefer a v10 with th
Hi Jarkko,
>is it cool if I prepare a separate set of fixes for all issues
>in v9? I do not see any problem that could not be fixed without
>major structural changes.
to be honest - I would prefer a v10 with the fixes included, especially since
there were quite a few issues/remarks.
If you
Hey
is it cool if I prepare a separate set of fixes for all issues
in v9? I do not see any problem that could not be fixed without
major structural changes.
/Jarkko
On Fri, Dec 05, 2014 at 12:17:40AM +0100, Peter Hüwe wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 06:55:16 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
>
Am Donnerstag, 4. Dezember 2014, 06:55:16 schrieb Jarkko Sakkinen:
> TPM 2.0 devices are separated by adding a field 'flags' to struct
> tpm_chip and defining a flag TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 for tagging them.
>
> This patch adds the following internal functions:
>
> - tpm2_get_random()
> - tpm2_get_tpm
TPM 2.0 devices are separated by adding a field 'flags' to struct
tpm_chip and defining a flag TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2 for tagging them.
This patch adds the following internal functions:
- tpm2_get_random()
- tpm2_get_tpm_pt()
- tpm2_pcr_extend()
- tpm2_pcr_read()
- tpm2_startup()
Additionally, the f
5 matches
Mail list logo