On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:49 AM Kent Gibson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 07:27:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:36 AM Kent Gibson wrote:
...
> > Shouldn't we rather return 0/1 guaranteed?
> >
> > Perhaps
> >
> > if (active_low)
> > return !value;
> >
> >
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 07:27:37PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:36 AM Kent Gibson wrote:
> >
> > Add support for setting debounce on a line via the GPIO uAPI.
> > Where debounce is not supported by hardware, a software debounce is
> > provided.
> >
> > The implementati
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 5:36 AM Kent Gibson wrote:
>
> Add support for setting debounce on a line via the GPIO uAPI.
> Where debounce is not supported by hardware, a software debounce is
> provided.
>
> The implementation of the software debouncer waits for the line to be
> stable for the debounce
Add support for setting debounce on a line via the GPIO uAPI.
Where debounce is not supported by hardware, a software debounce is
provided.
The implementation of the software debouncer waits for the line to be
stable for the debounce period before determining if a level change,
and a corresponding
4 matches
Mail list logo