Re: [PATCH v9 00/16] re-enable DAX PMD support

2016-11-03 Thread Dave Chinner
et... > > I CC'd your "da...@fromorbit.com" address on the entire set, as well as all > the usual lists (linux-xfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-nvdimm, etc). Ok, now I'm /really/ confused. Procmail logs show: >From ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com Wed Nov 02 06:56

Re: [PATCH v9 00/16] re-enable DAX PMD support

2016-11-03 Thread Ross Zwisler
On Thu, Nov 03, 2016 at 12:58:26PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:54:02PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based > > locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree > > based locki

Re: [PATCH v9 00/16] re-enable DAX PMD support

2016-11-02 Thread Dave Chinner
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 01:54:02PM -0600, Ross Zwisler wrote: > DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based > locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree > based locking scheme so that they can be re-enabled. I've seen patch 0/16 - wher

[PATCH v9 00/16] re-enable DAX PMD support

2016-11-01 Thread Ross Zwisler
DAX PMDs have been disabled since Jan Kara introduced DAX radix tree based locking. This series allows DAX PMDs to participate in the DAX radix tree based locking scheme so that they can be re-enabled. Previously we had talked about this series going through the XFS tree, but Jan has a patch set