On Sat, Feb 04, 2017 at 03:02:15PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Lorenzo,
>
> On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hanjun, Sinan,
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> >> From: Hanjun Guo
> >>
> >> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the i
Hi Lorenzo,
On 2017/2/4 2:36, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> Hanjun, Sinan,
>
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for pla
On 2017/2/3 22:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to e
Hanjun, Sinan,
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:54:50PM +0800, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo
>
> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable t
On 2/3/2017 11:40 AM, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> (2) Your HIDMA MSI does not depend on Agustin patch series to work
I confirm that my driver doesn't depend on Agustin's patch.
--
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm
Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologi
On Fri, Feb 03, 2017 at 10:57:44AM -0500, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> >> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base
> >> functionality.
> > Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if
> > you explained why you want t
On 2/3/2017 10:49 AM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00-12 are for the base functionality.
> Is that to support SMMUv3's own MSI generation? It would be helpful if
> you explained why you want this code to be merged beforehand,
> potentially without any in-tree user.
merge the IORT/SMMUv3 specific pieces to 4.11 so that the base
>>> implementation comes in place?
>>
>> Sorry, but I may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we
>> talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series?
>>
>
> I was talking about patche
may be missing something. Which IORT/SMMUv3 patches are we
> talking about? Do you have a pointer to a series?
>
I was talking about patches V8 00-12 of this particular one.
[PATCH v8 00/15] ACPI platform MSI support and its example mbigen
Patches 13-15 are specific for MBIGEN. 00
On 03/02/17 14:50, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
>> From: Hanjun Guo
>>
>> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
>> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
>> is ready, this patch set add few patches to e
On 1/18/2017 7:54 AM, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> From: Hanjun Guo
>
> With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
> of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
> is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
> msi support.
>
>
From: Hanjun Guo
With platform msi support landed in the kernel, and the introduction
of IORT for GICv3 ITS (PCI MSI) and SMMU, the framework for platform msi
is ready, this patch set add few patches to enable the ACPI platform
msi support.
For platform device connecting to ITS on arm platform,
12 matches
Mail list logo
