On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 11:04:54AM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 02 2021 at 15:49, paulmck wrote:
> > From: "Paul E. McKenney"
> >
> > Although smp_call_function() has the advantage of simplicity, using
> > it to check for cross-CPU clock desynchronization means that any CPU
> > bein
On Fri, Apr 02 2021 at 15:49, paulmck wrote:
> From: "Paul E. McKenney"
>
> Although smp_call_function() has the advantage of simplicity, using
> it to check for cross-CPU clock desynchronization means that any CPU
> being slow reduces the sensitivity of the checking across all CPUs.
> And it is n
From: "Paul E. McKenney"
Although smp_call_function() has the advantage of simplicity, using
it to check for cross-CPU clock desynchronization means that any CPU
being slow reduces the sensitivity of the checking across all CPUs.
And it is not uncommon for smp_call_function() latencies to be in t
3 matches
Mail list logo
