On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 8:33 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
>
> On Wed 2025-02-12 11:54:52, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > >
> > > > Is it me who cut something or the above missing this information (total
> > > > tests)?
> > > > If the latter, how
On Wed 2025-02-12 11:54:52, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> >
> > > Is it me who cut something or the above missing this information (total
> > > tests)?
> > > If the latter, how are we supposed to answer to the question if the
> > > failed te
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:26 PM Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> > Is it me who cut something or the above missing this information (total
> > tests)?
> > If the latter, how are we supposed to answer to the question if the failed
> > test
> > is from new bunch of cases I hypothetically added or regr
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 12:17 PM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:57:11AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:47:03AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:57:11AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:47:03AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > > wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:54 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:47:03AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:36AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > > - Use original te
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:47:03AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:36AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
...
> > > - Use original test assertions as KUNIT_*_EQ_MSG produces hard-to-parse
> > > messages.
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:40 AM Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:36AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> > This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> > being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
> > addition to the enclo
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:36AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
> being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
> addition to the enclosed patch, please consider this an RFC on the
> removal of the "Tes
This is one of just 3 remaining "Test Module" kselftests (the others
being bitmap and printf), the rest having been converted to KUnit. In
addition to the enclosed patch, please consider this an RFC on the
removal of the "Test Module" kselftest machinery.
I tested this using:
$ tools/testing/kuni
10 matches
Mail list logo