Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-27 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 14:00 +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 27-04-16, 11:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > > -- data_width: Maximum data width supported by hardware per AHB > > > > master > > > > -  (0 - 8bits, 1 - 16bits, ..., 5 - 256bits) > > > > +- data-width: Maximum data width supported by har

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-27 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 27-04-16, 11:25, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > > On 25-04-16, 15:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > >> There are several changes are done here: > >> > >> - Convert the property to be in bytes > >> > >> Besides this is common practice for such property

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-27 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:43 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25-04-16, 15:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote: >> There are several changes are done here: >> >> - Convert the property to be in bytes >> >> Besides this is common practice for such property the use of a value in bytes >> much more convenient than

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-27 Thread Vinod Koul
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 12:13:17PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 25-04-16, 15:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > There are several changes are done here: > > > > - Convert the property to be in bytes > > > > Besides this is common practice for such property the use of a value in > > bytes > > much

Re: [PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-26 Thread Viresh Kumar
On 25-04-16, 15:35, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > There are several changes are done here: > > - Convert the property to be in bytes > > Besides this is common practice for such property the use of a value in bytes > much more convenient than handling the encoded value. > > - Rename data_width to dat

[PATCH v6 2/4] dmaengine: dw: revisit data_width property

2016-04-25 Thread Andy Shevchenko
There are several changes are done here: - Convert the property to be in bytes Besides this is common practice for such property the use of a value in bytes much more convenient than handling the encoded value. - Rename data_width to data-width in the device tree bindings - While here, replace