> Personally, I preferred the old way where each device had interrupt enable
> bits that could be controlled independently of the interrupt controller. I
> have been told that I should abandon my preference for that type of
> antiquated architecture and welcome the brave new world of the unified
On 04/20/2016 02:52 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:28:41PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
From: David Daney
cn78xx has a different interrupt architecture, so we have to manage
the interrupts differently.
I'd appreciate if you could explain here why interrupts use NOAUTOEN and
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 05:28:41PM +0200, Jan Glauber wrote:
> From: David Daney
>
> cn78xx has a different interrupt architecture, so we have to manage
> the interrupts differently.
I'd appreciate if you could explain here why interrupts use NOAUTOEN and
have to be manually en-/disabled? This i
From: David Daney
cn78xx has a different interrupt architecture, so we have to manage
the interrupts differently.
Signed-off-by: David Daney
Signed-off-by: Jan Glauber
---
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-octeon.c | 131
1 file changed, 120 insertions(+), 11 del
4 matches
Mail list logo
