Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-30 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 09:27:18AM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Wednesday 30 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is

Re: [PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-30 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Wednesday 30 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is > instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be >

[PATCH v6 07/10] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-29 Thread Matt Porter
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be made. This allows for a much cleaner migration of drivers