Hi all,
Shea Levy writes:
> Hi Palmer,
>
> Palmer Dabbelt writes:
>
>> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:10:16 PDT (-0700), s...@shealevy.com wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Shea Levy writes:
>>>
This function is effectively identical across 14 architectures, and
the generic implementation is small
Hi Palmer,
Palmer Dabbelt writes:
> On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:10:16 PDT (-0700), s...@shealevy.com wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Shea Levy writes:
>>
>>> This function is effectively identical across 14 architectures, and
>>> the generic implementation is small enough to be negligible in the
>>> archite
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 04:10:16 PDT (-0700), s...@shealevy.com wrote:
Hi all,
Shea Levy writes:
This function is effectively identical across 14 architectures, and
the generic implementation is small enough to be negligible in the
architectures that do override it. Many of the remaining divergen
Hi all,
Shea Levy writes:
> This function is effectively identical across 14 architectures, and
> the generic implementation is small enough to be negligible in the
> architectures that do override it. Many of the remaining divergent
> implementations can be included in the common code path in f
This function is effectively identical across 14 architectures, and
the generic implementation is small enough to be negligible in the
architectures that do override it. Many of the remaining divergent
implementations can be included in the common code path in future,
further reducing code duplicat
5 matches
Mail list logo