Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-24 Thread Lee Jones
On Mon, 24 Jun 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: > Lee > > On 6/24/19 9:42 AM, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 05 Jun 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: > > > > > Hello > > > > > > The v5 patchset missed adding in the new validation code. > > > Patch 1 of the v5 series was squashed into patch 4 of the v5 series. > > >

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-24 Thread Dan Murphy
Lee On 6/24/19 9:42 AM, Lee Jones wrote: On Wed, 05 Jun 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: Hello The v5 patchset missed adding in the new validation code. Patch 1 of the v5 series was squashed into patch 4 of the v5 series. So this will reduce the patchset by 1. Sorry for the extra noise on the patchse

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-24 Thread Lee Jones
On Wed, 05 Jun 2019, Dan Murphy wrote: > Hello > > The v5 patchset missed adding in the new validation code. > Patch 1 of the v5 series was squashed into patch 4 of the v5 series. > So this will reduce the patchset by 1. > > Sorry for the extra noise on the patchsets. The change was lost when I

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-11 Thread Dan Murphy
Jacek Reviewed and tested the updated branch.  Looks good to me. Dan On 6/5/19 2:31 PM, Jacek Anaszewski wrote: Hi Dan, Thank you for the v6. Patches 4/5 and 5/5 don't contain amendments I made to the respective patches on the ib-leds-mfd-regulator branch (that address issues raised by Pavel

Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-05 Thread Jacek Anaszewski
Hi Dan, Thank you for the v6. Patches 4/5 and 5/5 don't contain amendments I made to the respective patches on the ib-leds-mfd-regulator branch (that address issues raised by Pavel), so I just kept those unchanged. Besides that I updated the remaining ones. Please check the ib-leds-mfd-regulato

[PATCH v6 0/5] LM36274 Introduction

2019-06-05 Thread Dan Murphy
Hello The v5 patchset missed adding in the new validation code. Patch 1 of the v5 series was squashed into patch 4 of the v5 series. So this will reduce the patchset by 1. Sorry for the extra noise on the patchsets. The change was lost when I converted the patches from the mainline branch to th