On Mon, 14 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> >
> > > So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> > > the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
On Tue, Jan 08, 2013 at 10:27:54AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
> > So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> > the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
> > Shall we introduce a new config option to s
On Tue, 8 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> So this also reminds me that as long as CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME is selected,
> the blk_pm_add/put/peek_request functions will be in the block IO path.
> Shall we introduce a new config option to selectively build block
> runtime PM functionality? something like CONF
On 01/08/2013 01:11 AM, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
>
>> In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
>> layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841&r=1&w=2
>> And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
>> http://marc.info/?l=lin
On Sun, 6 Jan 2013, Aaron Lu wrote:
> In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
> layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841&r=1&w=2
> And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
> http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133727953625963&w=2
>
> To test:
> # ls
In August 2010, Jens and Alan discussed about "Runtime PM and the block
layer". http://marc.info/?t=12825910841&r=1&w=2
And then Alan has given a detailed implementation guide:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=133727953625963&w=2
To test:
# ls -l /sys/block/sda
/sys/devices/pci:00/:00:
6 matches
Mail list logo