On 10/03/2012 02:24 AM, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On 09/14/2012 12:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Thursday 13 September 20
On 09/14/2012 12:24 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
It would be sensible to make
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:24:53AM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > The driver knows the power sequence. Having to type the same sequence
> > into the DT or platform data for each board using the device wouuld be
> > retarded so we need the drivers to b
On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
>> On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in s
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a
> > > > way that drivers can use it
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a
> > > way that drivers can use it - ther
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a
> > way that drivers can use it - there will be drivers (perhaps not display
> > ones) that have a kno
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:23 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> DT support is actually the main point of power sequences, as outside of the
> DT
> we can always work the old way and use callbacks. If we were to remove DT
> support, I am not sure this work would still be worth being merged.
Ah, I gues
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:23 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> On Thursday 13 September 2012 13:50:47 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > I want to reiterate my opinion that I think power sequences in DT data
> > is the wrong way to go. Powering sequences are device specific issues
> > and should be handled in th
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:23:06PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> > I understand the logic behind handling powering sequences in the device
> > driver, but as we discussed for some classes of devices this might just
> > not
> > scale. I don't
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:23:06PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote:
> I understand the logic behind handling powering sequences in the device
> driver, but as we discussed for some classes of devices this might just not
> scale. I don't know how many different panels (each with different powering
It
On Thursday 13 September 2012 13:50:47 Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:57 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>
> > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that
> > was
> > kindly provided about the last version.
> >
> > I
On Thursday 13 September 2012 05:33:56 Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:27:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
>
> > On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >
> > > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that
> > > was
> > > kindly provided a
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 18:57 +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that was
> kindly provided about the last version.
>
> I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start looking
> for
> a maintainer who would be will
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 03:27:04PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> > New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that was
> > kindly provided about the last version.
> >
> > I think now is a good time to discuss integrating th
On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that was
> kindly provided about the last version.
>
> I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start looking
> for
> a maintainer who would be willing to merg
New revision of the power sequences, taking as usual the feedback that was
kindly provided about the last version.
I think now is a good time to discuss integrating this and to start looking for
a maintainer who would be willing to merge this into his/her tree (I am
especially thinking about the p
17 matches
Mail list logo
