Re: [PATCH v6] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware

On 8/2/2022 3:59 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * Jane Chu wrote: > >> With Commit 7917f9cdb503 ("acpi/nfit: rely on mce->misc to determine >> poison granularity") that changed nfit_handle_mce() callback to report >> badrange according to 1ULL << MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(mce->misc), it's been >> discovered

Re: [PATCH v6] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware

* Jane Chu wrote: > With Commit 7917f9cdb503 ("acpi/nfit: rely on mce->misc to determine > poison granularity") that changed nfit_handle_mce() callback to report > badrange according to 1ULL << MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(mce->misc), it's been > discovered that the mce->misc LSB field is 0x1000 bytes, he

[PATCH v6] x86/mce: retrieve poison range from hardware

With Commit 7917f9cdb503 ("acpi/nfit: rely on mce->misc to determine poison granularity") that changed nfit_handle_mce() callback to report badrange according to 1ULL << MCI_MISC_ADDR_LSB(mce->misc), it's been discovered that the mce->misc LSB field is 0x1000 bytes, hence injecting 2 back-to-back p