On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 11:10:54AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
> defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
>
> Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
> syscon device in a new "atmel,time
On 22/09/2014 at 11:10:54 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
> defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
>
> Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
> syscon device in a new "atmel,time-reg" pr
The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
syscon device in a new "atmel,time-reg" property which store both the
syscon device phandle and the register
On Thu, 11 Sep 2014 19:42:09 +0200
Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 11/09/2014 at 15:53:08 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> > The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
> > defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
> >
> > Use syscon to provide a proper DT representa
On 11/09/2014 at 15:53:08 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote :
> The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
> defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
>
> Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
> syscon device in a new "atmel,time-reg" pr
The GPBR registers are not part of the RTT block and thus should not be
defined in the reg property of the rtt node.
Use syscon to provide a proper DT representation and reference the GPBR
syscon device in a new "atmel,time-reg" property which store both the
syscon device phandle and the register
6 matches
Mail list logo