On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 06:34:13PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:39:54PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04
On Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 02:48:32PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 06:34:13PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:39:54PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > One of the actio
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 11:59:42AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:08:35AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Thursday 10 Nov 2016 23:40:54 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > T
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 06:34:13PM +0100, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:39:54PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > One of the actions carried out by device_link_add() is to reorder
> > > the lists used for
Hi Laurent,
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 1:08 AM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> On Thursday 10 Nov 2016 23:40:54 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> Don't try to make this more difficult than it is please. DEFER works
>> today really really we
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:39:54PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > One of the actions carried out by device_link_add() is to reorder
> > the lists used for device shutdown and system suspend/resume to
> > put the consumer devi
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:58:24PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > Yes, you can iterate a
> > lot of times, but that's fine, we have time at boot to do that (and
> > really, it is fast.)
>
> Deferred probe is left for late_i
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 02:08:35AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On Thursday 10 Nov 2016 23:40:54 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > This is more forward looking, but -- if we had an annotation in
> > > Kconfig/tur
Hi Greg,
On Thursday 10 Nov 2016 23:40:54 Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > This is more forward looking, but -- if we had an annotation in
> > Kconfig/turned to a mod info section, or to start off with just a driver
> > MODULE_SUGGE
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:05:30AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Monday 07 Nov 2016 22:39:54 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> > >
> > > Currently, there is a problem with taking func
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 11:04:07PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> This is more forward looking, but -- if we had an annotation in Kconfig/turned
> to a mod info section, or to start off with just a driver MODULE_SUGGESTS()
> macro
> to start off with it might suffice for the driver core to requ
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:46:42AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez
> >> wrote:
> >>> As clarified by Rafael at Plumbe
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:14:32AM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Luis,
>
> On Wednesday 09 Nov 2016 16:59:30 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05
On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 1:59 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>>> As clarified by Rafael at Plumbers, this functional dependencies
>>> framework assumes your driver / subsystem sup
Hi Luis,
On Wednesday 09 Nov 2016 16:59:30 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:
Hi Luis,
On Monday 07 Nov 2016 22:39:54 Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki
> >
> > Currently, there is a problem with taking functional dependencies
> > between devices into account.
> >
> > What I mean by a
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:39 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>>
>> Currently, there is a problem with taking functional dependencies
>> between devices into account.
>>
>> What I mean by a "functional dep
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> > Hi Rafael,
>>> >
>>> > sorry for not
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 10:22 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> > Hi Rafael,
>> >
>> > sorry for not responding to v5 of your series earlier, just sending
>> > this o
On Wed, Nov 09, 2016 at 10:36:54AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
> On 09.11.2016 07:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:58:24PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> Furthermore -- how does this framework compare to Andrzej's resource
> tracking
> solution? I conf
On 09.11.2016 07:45, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:58:24PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
Furthermore -- how does this framework compare to Andrzej's resource
tracking
solution? I confess I have not had a chance yet to review yet but in light
of
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:58:24PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > Furthermore -- how does this framework compare to Andrzej's resource
> > > tracking
> > > solution? I confess I have not had a chance yet to review yet but in
> > > light of
> > > this question it would be good to know if An
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:43:35PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:21:04PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:45:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:22:50PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > > We have n
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:21:04PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:45:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:22:50PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > > We have no explicit semantics to check if a driver / subsystem
> > > supports deferre
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 07:45:41AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:22:50PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> > We have no explicit semantics to check if a driver / subsystem
> > supports deferred probe.
>
> Why would we need such a thing?
It depends on the impact of
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:22:50PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> We have no explicit semantics to check if a driver / subsystem
> supports deferred probe.
Why would we need such a thing?
thanks,
greg k-h
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki
>
> Currently, there is a problem with taking functional dependencies
> between devices into account.
>
> What I mean by a "functional dependency" is when the driver of device
> B needs device A to be fu
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > Hi Rafael,
> >
> > sorry for not responding to v5 of your series earlier, just sending
> > this out now in the hope that it reaches you before your travels.
> >
On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 05:25:51PM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > - Modify device_links_check_suppliers(), device_links_driver_bound(),
> > > device_links
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> +/*
> + * Device link flags.
> + *
> + * STATELESS: The core won't track the presence of supplier/consumer drivers.
> + * AUTOREMOVE: Remove this link automatically on consumer driver unbind.
> + */
> +#define DL_FLAG_STATELESS
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:19:02PM +0200, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> sorry for not responding to v5 of your series earlier, just sending
> this out now in the hope that it reaches you before your travels.
>
> On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > - Modif
Hi Rafael,
sorry for not responding to v5 of your series earlier, just sending
this out now in the hope that it reaches you before your travels.
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 02:51:04PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> - Modify device_links_check_suppliers(), device_links_driver_bound(),
> device_li
From: Rafael J. Wysocki
Currently, there is a problem with taking functional dependencies
between devices into account.
What I mean by a "functional dependency" is when the driver of device
B needs device A to be functional and (generally) its driver to be
present in order to work properly. Thi
33 matches
Mail list logo
