> On Jan 28, 2021, at 8:58 AM, David Howells wrote:
>
> Nayna wrote:
>
>> Thanks Eric for clarifying. I was confusing it with with the broader meaning
>> of revocation i.e. certificate revocation list. To avoid similar confusion in
>> the future, I wonder if we should call it as 'blocklist' o
Nayna wrote:
> Thanks Eric for clarifying. I was confusing it with with the broader meaning
> of revocation i.e. certificate revocation list. To avoid similar confusion in
> the future, I wonder if we should call it as 'blocklist' or 'denylist' as
> suggested in the document. This is to avoid con
On 1/27/21 11:11 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
On Jan 27, 2021, at 8:54 PM, Nayna wrote:
On 1/22/21 1:10 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
This fixes CVE-2020-26541.
The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEF
On 1/22/21 1:10 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
This fixes CVE-2020-26541.
The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
Boot enabled. The dbx is capable of containing any number of
EFI_CERT_X509_SHA
> On Jan 27, 2021, at 8:54 PM, Nayna wrote:
>
>
> On 1/22/21 1:10 PM, Eric Snowberg wrote:
>> This fixes CVE-2020-26541.
>>
>> The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
>> revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
>> Boot enabled.
This fixes CVE-2020-26541.
The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of now
revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secure
Boot enabled. The dbx is capable of containing any number of
EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID, and EFI_CERT_
6 matches
Mail list logo
