Hello Pavel,
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 07:24:41PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > +__attribute__((nonnull))
> > > >
> > > > static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> > > >
> > > >struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle
> > > >
Hi!
> > > +__attribute__((nonnull))
> > >
> > > static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> > >
> > > struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> > >
> > > {
> >
> > This normally goes elsewhere -- right? I'd expect:
> >
> >
> > sta
Hello Pavel,
Am Samstag, 19. September 2020, 11:44:18 CEST schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > Since commit 141f15c66d94 ("leds: pwm: remove header") that platform
> > interface is not usable from outside and there seems to be no in tree
> > user anymore. All in-tree users of the leds-pwm driver seem to us
Besides Pavel's note about the __attribute__((nonnull)) position
Reviewed-by: Marek BehĂșn
Hi!
> Since commit 141f15c66d94 ("leds: pwm: remove header") that platform
> interface is not usable from outside and there seems to be no in tree
> user anymore. All in-tree users of the leds-pwm driver seem to use DT
> currently. Getting rid of the old platform interface will allow the
> leds-
Since commit 141f15c66d94 ("leds: pwm: remove header") that platform
interface is not usable from outside and there seems to be no in tree
user anymore. All in-tree users of the leds-pwm driver seem to use DT
currently. Getting rid of the old platform interface will allow the
leds-pwm driver to s
6 matches
Mail list logo