Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-29 Thread Matt Porter
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 10:28:46PM +, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is >

Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-28 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Monday 28 January 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is > > ins

Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-28 Thread Andy Shevchenko
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32 PM, Matt Porter wrote: > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is > instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will

Re: [PATCH v5 07/14] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-23 Thread Arnd Bergmann
On Tuesday 15 January 2013, Matt Porter wrote: > Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts > both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and > dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is > instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be > ma

[PATCH v5 07/14] dmaengine: add dma_request_slave_channel_compat()

2013-01-15 Thread Matt Porter
Adds a dma_request_slave_channel_compat() wrapper which accepts both the arguments from dma_request_channel() and dma_request_slave_channel(). Based on whether the driver is instantiated via DT, the appropriate channel request call will be made. This allows for a much cleaner migration of drivers