Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation

On Wed, 20 Dec 2023 18:48:43 +0900 Masami Hiramatsu (Google) wrote: > > From: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" > > > > In order to introduce sub-buffer size per ring buffer, some internal > > refactoring is needed. As ring_buffer_print_page_header() will depend on > > the trace_buffer structure, i

Re: [PATCH v5 01/15] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation

On Tue, 19 Dec 2023 13:54:15 -0500 Steven Rostedt wrote: > From: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" > > In order to introduce sub-buffer size per ring buffer, some internal > refactoring is needed. As ring_buffer_print_page_header() will depend on > the trace_buffer structure, it is moved after the

[PATCH v5 01/15] ring-buffer: Refactor ring buffer implementation

From: "Tzvetomir Stoyanov (VMware)" In order to introduce sub-buffer size per ring buffer, some internal refactoring is needed. As ring_buffer_print_page_header() will depend on the trace_buffer structure, it is moved after the structure definition. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-trace-dev