Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

2017-11-01 Thread Linus Walleij
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 9:18 AM, Jon Hunter wrote: > Ping! I am mostly happy with the series but: - I would like Grygorii to get time to review it or at least ACK and say his points are adressed. - Thierry said quite early that he has to make a v6 respin since it collides with other patches

Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

2017-10-26 Thread Jon Hunter
Ping! On 23/10/17 09:47, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On 16/10/17 19:09, Jon Hunter wrote: >> Hi Linus, >> >> On 13/10/17 16:49, Thierry Reding wrote: >>> From: Thierry Reding >>> >>> Hi Linus, >>> >>> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip >>> integration.

Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

2017-10-23 Thread Jon Hunter
Hi Linus, On 16/10/17 19:09, Jon Hunter wrote: > Hi Linus, > > On 13/10/17 16:49, Thierry Reding wrote: >> From: Thierry Reding >> >> Hi Linus, >> >> here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip >> integration. I've dropped the banked infrastructure for now as per the

Re: [PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

2017-10-16 Thread Jon Hunter
Hi Linus, On 13/10/17 16:49, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > Hi Linus, > > here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip > integration. I've dropped the banked infrastructure for now as per the > discussion with Grygorii. > > The first couple of patch

[PATCH v5 00/13] gpio: Tight IRQ chip integration

2017-10-13 Thread Thierry Reding
From: Thierry Reding Hi Linus, here's the latest series of patches that implement the tighter IRQ chip integration. I've dropped the banked infrastructure for now as per the discussion with Grygorii. The first couple of patches are mostly preparatory work in order to consolidate all IRQ chip re