On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 05:47:47PM +0800, xinhui wrote:
>
>
> On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> >
> >I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...
> >
> sorry for noise.
> In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is
> changed by accident.
> So I resen
On 2016年06月02日 17:33, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...
sorry for noise.
In recent days, our smtp server has some bugs that mails' Message-Id is changed
by accident.
So I resend them just for sure.
sorry again...
I'm thinking one copy a day is quite enough...
change from v4:
BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue.
struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine.
native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix
it.
sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!!
cha
change from v4:
BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue.
struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine.
native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix
it.
sorry for not even doing a test on bigendian machine before!!!
cha
From: root
change from v4:
BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue.
struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine.
native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix
it.
change from v3:
a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6
From: root
change from v4:
BUG FIX. thanks boqun reporting this issue.
struct __qspinlock has different layout in bigendian mahcine.
native_queued_spin_unlock() may write value to a wrong address. now fix
it.
change from v3:
a big change in [PATCH v4 4/6
7 matches
Mail list logo
