This mini-series removes the "disable-VCCQ-power-rail-for-some-Flash-chips"
quirk, and cleans up after the dust settles.
Differences between v5 and v6:
- Reword patch 1 commit message (per Martin)
- Collect tags
Marc Gonzalez (2):
Revert "scsi: ufs: disable vccq if it's not needed by UFS device
On Sat, 23 Feb 2019, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> Martin,
>
> Could you send this series to -next so that it gets some exposure
> and testing during the 5.1 RC cycle?
Replying for the purpose of providing some gravitas to this set.
These patches are required to support some exciting consumer hardware
Martin,
Could you send this series to -next so that it gets some exposure
and testing during the 5.1 RC cycle?
Regards.
On 11/02/2019 14:31, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> Casting a wide net to get as many eyeballs on the subject as possible.
>
> I'm splitting this mini series off from the main "UFS o
Hi Marc,
On 11/02/19 7:01 PM, Marc Gonzalez wrote:
> Casting a wide net to get as many eyeballs on the subject as possible.
>
> I'm splitting this mini series off from the main "UFS on APQ8098/MSM8998"
> as it's 1) ufs/scsi specific 2) controversial (to my surprise)
>
> Please send all your Revi
Casting a wide net to get as many eyeballs on the subject as possible.
I'm splitting this mini series off from the main "UFS on APQ8098/MSM8998"
as it's 1) ufs/scsi specific 2) controversial (to my surprise)
Please send all your Reviewed-by: tags if you agree with the patch,
and/or voice your con
5 matches
Mail list logo
