2016-10-26 19:50 GMT+08:00 Borislav Petkov :
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:35:26PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
>> From: Wanpeng Li
>>
>> As Peterz pointed out:
>>
>> | The thing is, many many smp_reschedule_interrupt() invocations don't
>> | actually execute anything much at all and are only send to t
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 07:35:26PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li
>
> As Peterz pointed out:
>
> | The thing is, many many smp_reschedule_interrupt() invocations don't
> | actually execute anything much at all and are only send to tickle the
> | return to user path (which does the a
On 26/10/2016 13:35, Wanpeng Li wrote:
> From: Wanpeng Li
>
> As Peterz pointed out:
>
> | The thing is, many many smp_reschedule_interrupt() invocations don't
> | actually execute anything much at all and are only send to tickle the
> | return to user path (which does the actual preemption).
From: Wanpeng Li
As Peterz pointed out:
| The thing is, many many smp_reschedule_interrupt() invocations don't
| actually execute anything much at all and are only send to tickle the
| return to user path (which does the actual preemption).
This patch add write msr notrace to avoid the debug co
4 matches
Mail list logo