Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-16 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 17:53 +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > Hi Mike, > > 于 14-9-16 上午11:56, Mike Galbraith 写道: > > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 10:44 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > >> On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > >>> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: >

Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-16 Thread Wanpeng Li
Hi Mike, 于 14-9-16 上午11:56, Mike Galbraith 写道: On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 10:44 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: There is no response for two months since posting v4. What can I do for push

Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-15 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 10:44 -0600, Toshi Kani wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > > > There is no response for two months since posting v4. > > > What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? > > >

Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-15 Thread Toshi Kani
On Mon, 2014-09-15 at 06:25 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > > There is no response for two months since posting v4. > > What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? > > Looks to me like we have two patches floating about for more or

Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-14 Thread Mike Galbraith
On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 16:21 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: > There is no response for two months since posting v4. > What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? Looks to me like we have two patches floating about for more or less the same problem, this one, and... https://lkml.org/lkml/201

Re: [PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-11 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu
There is no response for two months since posting v4. What can I do for pushing the patch to upstream? Thanks, Yasuaki Ishimatsu (2014/09/04 11:46), Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote: llc_shared_map is not cleared even if CPU is offline or hot removed. So when hot-plugging CPU and assigning new CPU numbe

[PATCH v5] x86,cpu-hotplug: assign same CPU number to readded CPU

2014-09-03 Thread Yasuaki Ishimatsu
llc_shared_map is not cleared even if CPU is offline or hot removed. So when hot-plugging CPU and assigning new CPU number to hot-added CPU, the mask has wrong value. The mask is used by CSF schduler to create sched_domain. So it breaks CFS scheduler. Here is a example on my system. My system has