Noticed that I accidentally dropped the ABI documentation for the new
port_type node during patchset revision.
Adding that back and resubmitting the patch.
Thanks,
Badhri.
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 1:07 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan
wrote:
> Thanks for all the reviews Guenter & Heikki.
> Heikki, Is t
Thanks for all the reviews Guenter & Heikki.
Heikki, Is there anything else that I need to address in this patch ?
Or is the patch ready to be merged ?
Thanks,
Badhri
On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 12:56 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan
wrote:
> User space applications in some cases have the need to enforce
User space applications in some cases have the need to enforce a
specific port type(DFP/UFP/DRP). This change allows userspace to
attempt setting the desired port type. Low level drivers can
however reject the request if the specific port type is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridhara
On 05/27/2017 01:52 PM, Badhri Jagan Sridharan wrote:
User space applications in some cases have the need to enforce a
specific port type(DFP/UFP/DRP). This change allows userspace to
attempt setting the desired port type. Low level drivers can
however reject the request if the specific port type
User space applications in some cases have the need to enforce a
specific port type(DFP/UFP/DRP). This change allows userspace to
attempt setting the desired port type. Low level drivers can
however reject the request if the specific port type is not supported.
Signed-off-by: Badhri Jagan Sridhara
5 matches
Mail list logo