On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/06/2015 11:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy?
> > Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say
> > interesting code in the
On 07/06/2015 11:51 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> So are there any ACKs missing from the last series posted by Andy?
> Yes, I have requested a Clk Ack, as there are some, lets say
> interesting code in the MFD driver which I am unsure about. However,
> we
On Tue, 07 Jul 2015, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06
On Monday, July 06, 2015 05:05:29 PM Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > >> > On Mon, J
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> >> > wrote:
> >> > > On W
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 5:50 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
>> > wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> > > > On
On Mon, 06 Jul 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> > wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2015-07-06 at 11:24 +0200, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > >
> > > > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() wou
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
> On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
>> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>
>> > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used
>> > when MFD
>> > core removes the device.
>> >
>> > After this p
On Wed, 2015-06-24 at 12:31 +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> > The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used
> > when MFD
> > core removes the device.
> >
> > After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed
> > ord
On Mon, 15 Jun 2015, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used when MFD
> core removes the device.
>
> After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed order. This
> behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on or
The newly introduced device_for_each_child_reverse() would be used when MFD
core removes the device.
After this patch applied the devices will be removed in a reversed order. This
behaviour is useful when devices have implicit dependency on order, i.e.
consider MFD device with serial bus controlle
12 matches
Mail list logo
