On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 9:25 PM Wolfram Sang wrote:
>
>
> > Wolfram says. From my side: I'd prefer to see the
> > disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping converted to flags first and then the
> > flags extended with whatever you need. disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping
> > could also be removed AFAICT - nobody use
> Wolfram says. From my side: I'd prefer to see the
> disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping converted to flags first and then the
> flags extended with whatever you need. disable_i2c_core_irq_mapping
> could also be removed AFAICT - nobody uses it.
I haven't read the details here, just saying that
'disabl
On Tue, Aug 11, 2020 at 10:00 AM Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
> Hi Bartosz,
>
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:12:00PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM Sakari Ailus wrote:
> > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > >
> > > > Rafael: I think that there are two issues with patch 1/5:
Hi Bartosz,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 08:12:00PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM Sakari Ailus wrote:
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > >
> > > Rafael: I think that there are two issues with patch 1/5:
> > > 1. It adds a very specific boolean flag to a structure that's mean
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 10:26 AM Sakari Ailus wrote:
>
[snip]
> >
> > Rafael: I think that there are two issues with patch 1/5:
> > 1. It adds a very specific boolean flag to a structure that's meant to
> > be very general. As I pointed out in the i2c patch: at the very least
> > this could be m
Hi Bartosz,
Apologies for the late reply --- I was expecting more discussion which
never happened...
On Wed, Mar 25, 2020 at 02:48:47PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> pon., 23 mar 2020 o 22:31 Sakari Ailus
> napisał(a):
> >
> > Bartosz,
> >
> > On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 02:10:32PM +0100, Bart
6 matches
Mail list logo
