On Saturday 28 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> It's not as much a problem as a generic question : does a driver belong to
> arch/* ?
>
> Personaly it would have been far simpler for me to have it through the pxa
> tree,
> but I want to be sure it's the right place. Others will follow, pxa mai
Arnd Bergmann writes:
> On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>>
>> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not
>> >> very nice,
>> >> but it has to la
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
> >> nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubboc
On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:38:54PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
> >> nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very
>> nice,
>> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
>
> drivers/platform/arm ?
Most certainly.
On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones writes:
> >> > Arnd, Greg,
> >> >
> >> > Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
>
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
>
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c
Greg Kroah-Hartman writes:
> On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>>
>> > Hi Arnd and Greg,
>> It's been a week, backlog ping ?
>
> If only my backlog was just one week...
Ah, that's bad :)
> And I'm not the mfd maintainer...
I know. The que
On Sat, Feb 28, 2015 at 10:57:30AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Robert Jarzmik writes:
>
> > Hi Arnd and Greg,
> It's been a week, backlog ping ?
If only my backlog was just one week...
And I'm not the mfd maintainer...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kerne
Robert Jarzmik writes:
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
It's been a week, backlog ping ?
>
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. As for the reason it is extracted, see submitted
> commit [1] for reference.
>
> The main question is : where does it belong in th
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > Arnd, Greg,
> >
> > Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
>
> FWIW...
>
> The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
> multiplex a couple things o
On Tue, 17 Feb 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> Arnd, Greg,
>
> Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
FWIW...
The Lubbock is an ancient development board (circa 2003) using a CPLD to
multiplex a couple things on the board. I really doubt anyone would
reprogram this CPLD
Arnd, Greg,
Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones wrote:
> > What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
> >
> > For advice, see:
> >
> > Documentation/email-clients.txt
> While at day work,
Lee Jones writes:
> What's all this? Please configure your mail client correctly.
>
> For advice, see:
>
> Documentation/email-clients.txt
While at day work, I have only access to web mail ...
>> 2) after v2, we _both_ agreed that the accurate name is "cplds"
>> which exactly what is in
mar Gala" , "Daniel
> Mack" , "Haojian Zhuang" ,
> "Samuel Ortiz" , "Grant Likely"
> , devicet...@vger.kernel.org,
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "Arnd
> Bergmann" , "Russell King - ARM Linux&q
z" , "Grant Likely" ,
devicet...@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org, "Arnd Bergmann" , "Russell
King - ARM Linux" , "Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov"
Envoyé: Lundi 16 Février 2015 14:05:49
Objet: Re: [PATCH v4
On Sat, 24 Jan 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
> Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
>
> Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
> gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a dri
Lubbock () board is the IO motherboard of the Intel PXA25x Development
Platform, which supports the Lubbock pxa25x soc board.
Historically, this support was in arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. When
gpio-pxa was moved to drivers/pxa, it became a driver, and its
initialization and probing happened at po
17 matches
Mail list logo
